Don't worry, Ian. I'm not making the same mistakes again! est 2016.
 
HomeMainframeCalendarJurassic Mainframe NewsFAQSearchMemberlistUsergroupsRegisterLog inJurassic-Pedia

Share | 
 

 General Movie Discussion

View previous topic View next topic Go down 
Go to page : Previous  1 ... 10 ... 17, 18, 19, 20  Next
AuthorMessage
Rhedosaurus
Veteran
Veteran
avatar

Posts : 3172
Points : 3824
Reputation : 36
Join date : 2016-06-08
Age : 29
Location : Armada, Michigan

PostSubject: Re: General Movie Discussion   Sat Sep 16, 2017 5:23 pm

@BarrytheOnyx wrote:
@Rhedosaurus wrote:
@Sickle_Claw wrote:
@Rhedosaurus wrote:
@Sickle_Claw wrote:
@Rhedosaurus wrote:
It looks like J-Law's new movie, Mother!, is going to be a flop.

Yeah like Troyal said I've heard from other critics that the movie is very pretentious and constantly beats you over the head with the metaphor.

Her hurricane comment did the most damage with the GA though.
https:

mother! gets a Cinemascope of F.

Wow. So seems everyone hates it.

She said that she's taking a 2 year break. Hopefully, she wises up and learns to keep her mouth shut more often.

Man, Paramount Pictures just cannot can't a break these days can they?!

After a string of underwhelming box office results, flops and bad investments, they better start investing in smarter movie ideas otherwise they will go under before Sony Pictures does.

Actually, Paramount already has a head start. Depending on what you read, Vicom/Paramount is at least $12 billion in debt. But I have heard that it's $14 billion.

I honestly think that they gave James Cameron the Terminator rights back in exchange for him making Terminator movies for them. (Although, given their position, Paramount had to have given Cameron most of the overall power. Think of like how Fox was with George Lucas via the prequels.) At this point, given how the Transformers franchise has been rendered so toxic and how Star Trek is a mess, Terminator and James Cameron are the only thing Paramount has going for them.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Troyal1
Veteran
Veteran
avatar

Posts : 1117
Points : 1705
Reputation : 34
Join date : 2016-06-08
Age : 23

PostSubject: Re: General Movie Discussion   Sat Sep 16, 2017 5:31 pm

@Rhedosaurus wrote:
@Sickle_Claw wrote:
@Rhedosaurus wrote:
@Sickle_Claw wrote:
@Rhedosaurus wrote:
It looks like J-Law's new movie, Mother!, is going to be a flop.

Yeah like Troyal said I've heard from other critics that the movie is very pretentious and constantly beats you over the head with the metaphor.

Her hurricane comment did the most damage with the GA though.
https:

mother! gets a Cinemascope of F.

Wow. So seems everyone hates it.

She said that she's taking a 2 year break. Hopefully, she wises up and learns to keep her mouth shut more often.

How about her taking a break from insulting innocent people and insinuating the victims deserved the hurricane? And just stick to acting.

Doubtful but I can dream.
Back to top Go down
View user profile Online
BarrytheOnyx
Veteran
Veteran
avatar

Posts : 949
Points : 1538
Reputation : 32
Join date : 2016-06-17
Age : 25
Location : Stratford Upon Avon, England

PostSubject: Re: General Movie Discussion   Sat Sep 16, 2017 5:54 pm

@Rhedosaurus wrote:

Actually, Paramount already has a head start. Depending on what you read, Vicom/Paramount is at least $12 billion in debt. But I have heard that it's $14 billion.  

I honestly think that they gave James Cameron the Terminator rights back in exchange for him making Terminator movies for them. (Although, given their position, Paramount had to have given Cameron most of the overall power. Think of like how Fox was with George Lucas via the prequels.) At this point, given how the Transformers franchise has been rendered so toxic and how Star Trek is a mess, Terminator and James Cameron are the only thing Paramount has going for them.

I have to wonder what's stopping them from seeking out other ideas, other properties to replace Transformers as their biggest box office IP. Let's say I was a successful producer, director screenwriter and I wanted to pitch an idea to them that had huge potential to be a hit and the option for sequels, what would stop them from taking that on as a serious investment? Is it the fact they're cripplingly in debt?

Also, in addition to Terminator, Paramount does have the still relatively strong Mission: Impossible franchise, which might have a good chance in 2018.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Rhedosaurus
Veteran
Veteran
avatar

Posts : 3172
Points : 3824
Reputation : 36
Join date : 2016-06-08
Age : 29
Location : Armada, Michigan

PostSubject: Re: General Movie Discussion   Sat Sep 16, 2017 6:04 pm

@BarrytheOnyx wrote:
@Rhedosaurus wrote:

Actually, Paramount already has a head start. Depending on what you read, Vicom/Paramount is at least $12 billion in debt. But I have heard that it's $14 billion.  

I honestly think that they gave James Cameron the Terminator rights back in exchange for him making Terminator movies for them. (Although, given their position, Paramount had to have given Cameron most of the overall power. Think of like how Fox was with George Lucas via the prequels.) At this point, given how the Transformers franchise has been rendered so toxic and how Star Trek is a mess, Terminator and James Cameron are the only thing Paramount has going for them.

I have to wonder what's stopping them from seeking out other ideas, other properties to replace Transformers as their biggest box office IP. Let's say I was a successful producer, director screenwriter and I wanted to pitch an idea to them that had huge potential to be a hit and the option for sequels, what would stop them from taking that on as a serious investment? Is it the fact they're cripplingly in debt?

Also, in addition to Terminator, Paramount does have the still relatively strong Mission: Impossible franchise, which might have a good chance in 2018.

That could be part of it. Sony's in bad shape, but at least they are trying to get out of debt by throwing everything they can think of and hoping it will work. That and there's the chance of the Sony mother company bailing them out. Paramount/Viacom doesn't have that. As for not trying things that work, it's the mindset of them not losing what little they have left by doing something new for the fear of finishing themselves off. I just think they are waiting for somebody to buy them at this point.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
BarrytheOnyx
Veteran
Veteran
avatar

Posts : 949
Points : 1538
Reputation : 32
Join date : 2016-06-17
Age : 25
Location : Stratford Upon Avon, England

PostSubject: Re: General Movie Discussion   Sun Sep 17, 2017 5:04 pm

I thought some of you guys might be interested in this, a high quality restoration of the very first dinosaur classic, arriving on 19th September. Needless to say, this is probably the version for any film fan or dinosaur to buy.

The Lost World (1925) blu ray review
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Sickle_Claw
Moderator
Moderator
avatar

Posts : 957
Points : 3080
Reputation : 16
Join date : 2012-04-07

PostSubject: Re: General Movie Discussion   Mon Sep 18, 2017 1:22 pm


_______________
Read my Story Jurassic Park: Chaos Theory!
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Rhedosaurus
Veteran
Veteran
avatar

Posts : 3172
Points : 3824
Reputation : 36
Join date : 2016-06-08
Age : 29
Location : Armada, Michigan

PostSubject: Re: General Movie Discussion   Mon Sep 18, 2017 3:23 pm

@BarrytheOnyx wrote:
I thought some of you guys might be interested in this, a high quality restoration of the very first dinosaur classic, arriving on 19th September. Needless to say, this is probably the version for any film fan or dinosaur to buy.

The Lost World (1925) blu ray review

Thanks for the heads up. Very Happy Although, I've already got the Image Entertainment DVD, which until this came out, had 90% of the original footage and thus was the best, I do want this DVD. Besides, the extras, including The Ghost Of Slumber Mountain, are worth having.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Troyal1
Veteran
Veteran
avatar

Posts : 1117
Points : 1705
Reputation : 34
Join date : 2016-06-08
Age : 23

PostSubject: Re: General Movie Discussion   Mon Sep 18, 2017 3:30 pm

I was looking more at cinemascore and the emoji movie has a B lol. I'm not sure that site accounts for too much.
Back to top Go down
View user profile Online
Troyal1
Veteran
Veteran
avatar

Posts : 1117
Points : 1705
Reputation : 34
Join date : 2016-06-08
Age : 23

PostSubject: Re: General Movie Discussion   Mon Sep 18, 2017 3:31 pm

@Sickle_Claw wrote:

I won't lie I'm intrigued. But the style of the words up on screen looks terrible and fan made to me.
Back to top Go down
View user profile Online
BarrytheOnyx
Veteran
Veteran
avatar

Posts : 949
Points : 1538
Reputation : 32
Join date : 2016-06-17
Age : 25
Location : Stratford Upon Avon, England

PostSubject: Re: General Movie Discussion   Mon Sep 18, 2017 6:11 pm

@Sickle_Claw wrote:

No joke, I was actually watching Chris Stuckmann's gushing Hilariocity review for Lara Croft: Tomb Raider a few hours before this trailer dropped. It's going to be interesting if this one actually manages to be good rather than stupid and cheesy but entertaining.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Rhedosaurus
Veteran
Veteran
avatar

Posts : 3172
Points : 3824
Reputation : 36
Join date : 2016-06-08
Age : 29
Location : Armada, Michigan

PostSubject: Re: General Movie Discussion   Mon Sep 18, 2017 6:19 pm

@BarrytheOnyx wrote:
@Sickle_Claw wrote:

No joke, I was actually watching Chris Stuckmann's gushing Hilariocity review for Lara Croft: Tomb Raider a few hours before this trailer dropped. It's going to be interesting if this one actually manages to be good rather than stupid and cheesy but entertaining.

To be fair, Angelina Jolie really does Lara Croft justice. That and that movie was one of the better movies of 2001.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Dead2009
Administrator
Administrator
avatar

Posts : 1263
Points : 1905
Reputation : 21
Join date : 2016-06-07
Location : Maryland

PostSubject: Re: General Movie Discussion   Wed Sep 20, 2017 10:22 am


_______________
Last Movie Watched: Texas Chainsaw Massacre: The Next Generation (1994).
Last TV Show Watched: Mighty Morphin Power Rangers (S3:E6).
Last Video Game Played: Madden '18 (XBO).
http://bloggerofthedead.blogspot.com/​
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Sickle_Claw
Moderator
Moderator
avatar

Posts : 957
Points : 3080
Reputation : 16
Join date : 2012-04-07

PostSubject: Re: General Movie Discussion   Wed Sep 20, 2017 11:58 am

I have to say I liked the Tomb Raider trailer. Does it seem a lot like they are remaking the 2013 Tomb Raider game? Yes it does but to be honest this is probably a good thing.

_______________
Read my Story Jurassic Park: Chaos Theory!
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Troyal1
Veteran
Veteran
avatar

Posts : 1117
Points : 1705
Reputation : 34
Join date : 2016-06-08
Age : 23

PostSubject: Re: General Movie Discussion   Thu Sep 21, 2017 4:17 pm

Was having a slow day so I got the chance to go check out 'Wind River' with my mom.

It was no masterpiece in my eyes. But it was a very gritty and entertaining thriller.

It also relates to a very real issue I wasn't even aware existed.
Back to top Go down
View user profile Online
Dead2009
Administrator
Administrator
avatar

Posts : 1263
Points : 1905
Reputation : 21
Join date : 2016-06-07
Location : Maryland

PostSubject: Re: General Movie Discussion   Mon Sep 25, 2017 11:40 am


_______________
Last Movie Watched: Texas Chainsaw Massacre: The Next Generation (1994).
Last TV Show Watched: Mighty Morphin Power Rangers (S3:E6).
Last Video Game Played: Madden '18 (XBO).
http://bloggerofthedead.blogspot.com/​
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Rhedosaurus
Veteran
Veteran
avatar

Posts : 3172
Points : 3824
Reputation : 36
Join date : 2016-06-08
Age : 29
Location : Armada, Michigan

PostSubject: Re: General Movie Discussion   Tue Sep 26, 2017 2:38 pm

Here's the new trailer for Sony's Peter Rabbit movie.



I'll say this much. This trailer is bad, but at least it did 2 things right.

1. It has a good theme song.

2. We didn't see Peter crap out jelly beans like that one Easter Rabbit in Hop did...
Back to top Go down
View user profile
BarrytheOnyx
Veteran
Veteran
avatar

Posts : 949
Points : 1538
Reputation : 32
Join date : 2016-06-17
Age : 25
Location : Stratford Upon Avon, England

PostSubject: Re: General Movie Discussion   Tue Sep 26, 2017 4:01 pm

I am not a violent person. But that goddamn teaser trailer made me want to hit the director over the head with a blunt instrument and shove it up his arse for what he did! This is Peter Rabbit, classic children's literature we're talking about. Smurfs and Chipmunks are TV animation classics, to be sure, but they can be given a new lease of life in other mediums. But get Peter Rabbit wrong, deliberately no less, and there's no chance of wiping that stain off any time soon.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Rhedosaurus
Veteran
Veteran
avatar

Posts : 3172
Points : 3824
Reputation : 36
Join date : 2016-06-08
Age : 29
Location : Armada, Michigan

PostSubject: Re: General Movie Discussion   Tue Sep 26, 2017 6:17 pm

@BarrytheOnyx wrote:
I am not a violent person. But that goddamn teaser trailer made me want to hit the director over the head with a blunt instrument and shove it up his arse for what he did! This is Peter Rabbit, classic children's literature we're talking about. Smurfs and Chipmunks are TV animation classics, to be sure, but they can be given a new lease of life in other mediums. But get Peter Rabbit wrong, deliberately no less, and there's no chance of wiping that stain off any time soon.

If Sony is this stupid to know that 'modernizing' classics rarely work, then they deserve to go down.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Troyal1
Veteran
Veteran
avatar

Posts : 1117
Points : 1705
Reputation : 34
Join date : 2016-06-08
Age : 23

PostSubject: Re: General Movie Discussion   Tue Sep 26, 2017 10:08 pm

@BarrytheOnyx wrote:
I am not a violent person. But that goddamn teaser trailer made me want to hit the director over the head with a blunt instrument and shove it up his arse for what he did! This is Peter Rabbit, classic children's literature we're talking about. Smurfs and Chipmunks are TV animation classics, to be sure, but they can be given a new lease of life in other mediums. But get Peter Rabbit wrong, deliberately no less, and there's no chance of wiping that stain off any time soon.

I don't even understand why this is called Peter Rabbit. Is that name actually going to get people in seats for this garbage?

I sincerely doubt it.
Back to top Go down
View user profile Online
Sickle_Claw
Moderator
Moderator
avatar

Posts : 957
Points : 3080
Reputation : 16
Join date : 2012-04-07

PostSubject: Re: General Movie Discussion   Wed Sep 27, 2017 11:07 am


_______________
Read my Story Jurassic Park: Chaos Theory!
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Troyal1
Veteran
Veteran
avatar

Posts : 1117
Points : 1705
Reputation : 34
Join date : 2016-06-08
Age : 23

PostSubject: Re: General Movie Discussion   Wed Sep 27, 2017 12:11 pm

@Sickle_Claw wrote:

I didn't really care for his last movie but I still thought it was really well made. Thanks for Sharing. Looks interesting
Back to top Go down
View user profile Online
Sickle_Claw
Moderator
Moderator
avatar

Posts : 957
Points : 3080
Reputation : 16
Join date : 2012-04-07

PostSubject: Re: General Movie Discussion   Wed Sep 27, 2017 12:16 pm

@Troyal1 wrote:
@Sickle_Claw wrote:

I didn't really care for his last movie but I still thought it was really well made. Thanks for Sharing. Looks interesting

I would highly suggest reading the book. Theres a trilogy but you can get away with just reading the first book. Under 300 pages so most people should be able to get through it in a day or so. Let me just say that there is a lot going on in this movie, and I dont think you guys will be disappointed.

_______________
Read my Story Jurassic Park: Chaos Theory!
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Rhedosaurus
Veteran
Veteran
avatar

Posts : 3172
Points : 3824
Reputation : 36
Join date : 2016-06-08
Age : 29
Location : Armada, Michigan

PostSubject: Re: General Movie Discussion   Wed Sep 27, 2017 3:40 pm

It looks like 2019 is the 'do-or-die' year for Paramount.

I only see the upcoming Terminator movie as the one that people will go to. Mainly because of how James Cameron has the rights back and how he's making it a proper T3 movie. Top Gun is too much of a wild card and Transformers is far to toxic.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
BarrytheOnyx
Veteran
Veteran
avatar

Posts : 949
Points : 1538
Reputation : 32
Join date : 2016-06-17
Age : 25
Location : Stratford Upon Avon, England

PostSubject: Re: General Movie Discussion   Wed Sep 27, 2017 6:48 pm

Transformers could have a smidgeon of a chance if Michael Bay is booted off as director and someone else is brought on board to essentially reboot the franchise and focus on telling a simpler story without any of the added bullcrap the sequels added. If it gets an over 50% score on RT, I'll even volunteer my cash to see it. But that's a huge "if" and a very unlikely one.

Top Gun may be a wild card, but I could see it coming off thanks to Tom Cruise's star power. And then there's Spongebob. No comment there. I think the real sad part is that, as the article stated, its almost impossible to launch an original franchise that can appeal to a wide number of people and still be considered quality entertainment. Something like that would be a boon to Paramount, as Pirates of the Caribbean was to Disney back in 2003 when they were really struggling. When they allowed Disney to buy Marvel Studios, they may have signed their own death warrant.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Rhedosaurus
Veteran
Veteran
avatar

Posts : 3172
Points : 3824
Reputation : 36
Join date : 2016-06-08
Age : 29
Location : Armada, Michigan

PostSubject: Re: General Movie Discussion   Wed Sep 27, 2017 7:09 pm

@BarrytheOnyx wrote:
Transformers could have a smidgeon of a chance if Michael Bay is booted off as director and someone else is brought on board to essentially reboot the franchise and focus on telling a simpler story without any of the added bullcrap the sequels added. If it gets an over 50% score on RT, I'll even volunteer my cash to see it. But that's a huge "if" and a very unlikely one.

Top Gun may be a wild card, but I could see it coming off thanks to Tom Cruise's star power. And then there's Spongebob. No comment there. I think the real sad part is that, as the article stated, its almost impossible to launch an original franchise that can appeal to a wide number of people and still be considered quality entertainment. Something like that would be a boon to Paramount, as Pirates of the Caribbean was to Disney back in 2003 when they were really struggling. When they allowed Disney to buy Marvel Studios, they may have signed their own death warrant.

With Transformers, I think that it's progressed so far, that Paramount really can't boot off Michael Bay. Spielberg can, since he's barely done anything to help the franchise since the first movie, but not Bay. Besides, what's left after Unicron? I don't see much else and fans are getting sick of it.

If Paramount goes down for good, it's really going to be interesting so see who gets what. WB getting bought out by AT&T got rid of their debt, but who knows if they want to buy something from Paramount so soon. I can see Fox buying Terminator and maybe Top Gun. Disney, who knows. I just think they're waiting for Sony to go under so that they can get Spider-Man and probably Ghostbusters.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
TheDreamMaster
Administrator
Administrator
avatar

Posts : 750
Points : 1356
Reputation : 19
Join date : 2016-06-07
Age : 28
Location : USA

PostSubject: Re: General Movie Discussion   Wed Sep 27, 2017 8:02 pm

@Rhedosaurus wrote:
@BarrytheOnyx wrote:
Transformers could have a smidgeon of a chance if Michael Bay is booted off as director and someone else is brought on board to essentially reboot the franchise and focus on telling a simpler story without any of the added bullcrap the sequels added. If it gets an over 50% score on RT, I'll even volunteer my cash to see it. But that's a huge "if" and a very unlikely one.

Top Gun may be a wild card, but I could see it coming off thanks to Tom Cruise's star power. And then there's Spongebob. No comment there. I think the real sad part is that, as the article stated, its almost impossible to launch an original franchise that can appeal to a wide number of people and still be considered quality entertainment. Something like that would be a boon to Paramount, as Pirates of the Caribbean was to Disney back in 2003 when they were really struggling. When they allowed Disney to buy Marvel Studios, they may have signed their own death warrant.

With Transformers, I think that it's progressed so far, that Paramount really can't boot off Michael Bay. Spielberg can, since he's barely done anything to help the franchise since the first movie, but not Bay. Besides, what's left after Unicron? I don't see much else and fans are getting sick of it.

If Paramount goes down for good, it's really going to be interesting so see who gets what. WB getting bought out by AT&T got rid of their debt, but who knows if they want to buy something from Paramount so soon. I can see Fox buying Terminator and maybe Top Gun. Disney, who knows. I just think they're waiting for Sony to go under so that they can get Spider-Man and probably Ghostbusters.

I'm not saying Sony has any idea what they are doing, but Ghostbusters under Disney would be awful. Don't get me wrong, GB can be an adult property and a kids property, but watching Guardians of the Galaxy 2, a movie I adore, I feel like it was held back just a bit, just to appeal more to everyone. I'm not implying it needed to be R or anything, but I think Disney likely still sets a limit to what can happen in their films. While Disney acquiring GB MIGHT get us a proper sequel in the vein of Force Awakens (minus somewhat remaking the first film. Gozer's come back like 10 times in the comics, and was back in the video game.), if the acquisition happened within the next year or two, I just feel like we'd lose something. I know a lot of people like to hate on the GB reboot, but I still felt like those were working people, especially Leslie Jones. Going the corporate angle with GB to branch off the originals was always a fine idea, and passing the torch can work, but they have to be real people. It's not a superhero franchise, it doesn't need to be treated like one.

_______________
Make the Sayles JP IV script into an animated series! Admit it, you'd watch it.
 
"We'll use the Force."- Finn
 "That's not how the Force works!"- Han Solo
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Rhedosaurus
Veteran
Veteran
avatar

Posts : 3172
Points : 3824
Reputation : 36
Join date : 2016-06-08
Age : 29
Location : Armada, Michigan

PostSubject: Re: General Movie Discussion   Wed Sep 27, 2017 8:46 pm

@TheDreamMaster wrote:
@Rhedosaurus wrote:
@BarrytheOnyx wrote:
Transformers could have a smidgeon of a chance if Michael Bay is booted off as director and someone else is brought on board to essentially reboot the franchise and focus on telling a simpler story without any of the added bullcrap the sequels added. If it gets an over 50% score on RT, I'll even volunteer my cash to see it. But that's a huge "if" and a very unlikely one.

Top Gun may be a wild card, but I could see it coming off thanks to Tom Cruise's star power. And then there's Spongebob. No comment there. I think the real sad part is that, as the article stated, its almost impossible to launch an original franchise that can appeal to a wide number of people and still be considered quality entertainment. Something like that would be a boon to Paramount, as Pirates of the Caribbean was to Disney back in 2003 when they were really struggling. When they allowed Disney to buy Marvel Studios, they may have signed their own death warrant.

With Transformers, I think that it's progressed so far, that Paramount really can't boot off Michael Bay. Spielberg can, since he's barely done anything to help the franchise since the first movie, but not Bay. Besides, what's left after Unicron? I don't see much else and fans are getting sick of it.

If Paramount goes down for good, it's really going to be interesting so see who gets what. WB getting bought out by AT&T got rid of their debt, but who knows if they want to buy something from Paramount so soon. I can see Fox buying Terminator and maybe Top Gun. Disney, who knows. I just think they're waiting for Sony to go under so that they can get Spider-Man and probably Ghostbusters.

I'm not saying Sony has any idea what they are doing, but Ghostbusters under Disney would be awful. Don't get me wrong, GB can be an adult property and a kids property, but watching Guardians of the Galaxy 2, a movie I adore, I feel like it was held back just a bit, just to appeal more to everyone. I'm not implying it needed to be R or anything, but I think Disney likely still sets a limit to what can happen in their films. While Disney acquiring GB MIGHT get us a proper sequel in the vein of Force Awakens (minus somewhat remaking the first film. Gozer's come back like 10 times in the comics, and was back in the video game.), if the acquisition happened within the next year or two, I just feel like we'd lose something. I know a lot of people like to hate on the GB reboot, but I still felt like those were working people, especially Leslie Jones. Going the corporate angle with GB to branch off the originals was always a fine idea, and passing the torch can work, but they have to be real people. It's not a superhero franchise, it doesn't need to be treated like one.

To be fair, they didn't exactly hold back on Spider-Man Homecoming.

As for the Ghostbusters franchise, if Sony goes under, then who do you trust with the franchise? Because the only 2 movie studios I see are Fox and Warner Brothers.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
TheDreamMaster
Administrator
Administrator
avatar

Posts : 750
Points : 1356
Reputation : 19
Join date : 2016-06-07
Age : 28
Location : USA

PostSubject: Re: General Movie Discussion   Wed Sep 27, 2017 8:58 pm

@Rhedosaurus wrote:
@TheDreamMaster wrote:
@Rhedosaurus wrote:
@BarrytheOnyx wrote:
Transformers could have a smidgeon of a chance if Michael Bay is booted off as director and someone else is brought on board to essentially reboot the franchise and focus on telling a simpler story without any of the added bullcrap the sequels added. If it gets an over 50% score on RT, I'll even volunteer my cash to see it. But that's a huge "if" and a very unlikely one.

Top Gun may be a wild card, but I could see it coming off thanks to Tom Cruise's star power. And then there's Spongebob. No comment there. I think the real sad part is that, as the article stated, its almost impossible to launch an original franchise that can appeal to a wide number of people and still be considered quality entertainment. Something like that would be a boon to Paramount, as Pirates of the Caribbean was to Disney back in 2003 when they were really struggling. When they allowed Disney to buy Marvel Studios, they may have signed their own death warrant.

With Transformers, I think that it's progressed so far, that Paramount really can't boot off Michael Bay. Spielberg can, since he's barely done anything to help the franchise since the first movie, but not Bay. Besides, what's left after Unicron? I don't see much else and fans are getting sick of it.

If Paramount goes down for good, it's really going to be interesting so see who gets what. WB getting bought out by AT&T got rid of their debt, but who knows if they want to buy something from Paramount so soon. I can see Fox buying Terminator and maybe Top Gun. Disney, who knows. I just think they're waiting for Sony to go under so that they can get Spider-Man and probably Ghostbusters.

I'm not saying Sony has any idea what they are doing, but Ghostbusters under Disney would be awful. Don't get me wrong, GB can be an adult property and a kids property, but watching Guardians of the Galaxy 2, a movie I adore, I feel like it was held back just a bit, just to appeal more to everyone. I'm not implying it needed to be R or anything, but I think Disney likely still sets a limit to what can happen in their films. While Disney acquiring GB MIGHT get us a proper sequel in the vein of Force Awakens (minus somewhat remaking the first film. Gozer's come back like 10 times in the comics, and was back in the video game.), if the acquisition happened within the next year or two, I just feel like we'd lose something. I know a lot of people like to hate on the GB reboot, but I still felt like those were working people, especially Leslie Jones. Going the corporate angle with GB to branch off the originals was always a fine idea, and passing the torch can work, but they have to be real people. It's not a superhero franchise, it doesn't need to be treated like one.

To be fair, they didn't exactly hold back on Spider-Man Homecoming.

As for the Ghostbusters franchise, if Sony goes under, then who do you trust with the franchise? Because the only 2 movie studios I see are Fox and Warner Brothers.

That is a fair point on Homecoming I suppose. Right now, probably FOX of the two. At the very least they've made better decisions lately (minus with the main X-Men franchise, as Apocalypse was not very good.), and I could see them handing over some creative freedom, while still keeping some control, and not letting things spiral like Sony did with Feig, though Pascal was very much to blame there as well. FOX has only recently made better decisions and still not all are home runs, but I'd still say lesser of two evils.

Warner Brothers seems like they want to do good things, but at least regarding their DC properties, seem to want to rush into things. I haven't seen Wonder Woman yet, but I imagine WB themselves had less to do with it's success.

_______________
Make the Sayles JP IV script into an animated series! Admit it, you'd watch it.
 
"We'll use the Force."- Finn
 "That's not how the Force works!"- Han Solo
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Troyal1
Veteran
Veteran
avatar

Posts : 1117
Points : 1705
Reputation : 34
Join date : 2016-06-08
Age : 23

PostSubject: Re: General Movie Discussion   Fri Sep 29, 2017 2:48 am

The 'nice guys' movie (yes the one that literally just came out in 2016) is getting a TV reboot with 2 female leads..... wtf Hollywood???

http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/live-feed/female-nice-guys-tv-reboot-1044053
Back to top Go down
View user profile Online
jericho
Embryo
Embryo


Posts : 23
Points : 129
Reputation : 0
Join date : 2017-08-22

PostSubject: Re: General Movie Discussion   Fri Sep 29, 2017 7:12 am

who gets in trouble for sidelining movie references, me, or you?

What's, the fastest approach to understanding culture, aside from, losing subtitles so babies just get used to a world without them, and learn to translate for us, like, their Mexican or Russian parents, you know?
Back to top Go down
View user profile
BarrytheOnyx
Veteran
Veteran
avatar

Posts : 949
Points : 1538
Reputation : 32
Join date : 2016-06-17
Age : 25
Location : Stratford Upon Avon, England

PostSubject: Re: General Movie Discussion   Fri Sep 29, 2017 1:10 pm

@jericho wrote:
who gets in trouble for sidelining movie references, me, or you?

What's, the fastest approach to understanding culture, aside from, losing subtitles so babies just get used to a world without them, and learn to translate for us, like, their Mexican or Russian parents, you know?

I'm sorry, but how does this have anything to do with the previous post about The Nice Guys?

At any rate, I'm less than thrilled by this news and frankly see it as the film equivalent of trying to resuscitate someone by hitting them on the head with a wrench: wrongheaded and guaranteed to harm the property.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Sickle_Claw
Moderator
Moderator
avatar

Posts : 957
Points : 3080
Reputation : 16
Join date : 2012-04-07

PostSubject: Re: General Movie Discussion   Fri Sep 29, 2017 2:20 pm

http://deadline.com/2017/09/men-in-black-spinoff-may-17-2019-steven-spielberg-walter-parkes-laurie-macdonald-matt-holloway-art-marcum-1202179483/

Men in Black Spinoff is still happening, its going 'Global'. No crossover with 21 jump street though.

_______________
Read my Story Jurassic Park: Chaos Theory!
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Dead2009
Administrator
Administrator
avatar

Posts : 1263
Points : 1905
Reputation : 21
Join date : 2016-06-07
Location : Maryland

PostSubject: Re: General Movie Discussion   Fri Sep 29, 2017 8:23 pm

Apparently that film is still in development

"According to Deadline, Sony Pictures is in development on a new Men in Black spin-off which will not feature Will Smith or Tommy Lee Jones, but will expand on the world of the original trilogy. This will be a different project from the aborted 21 Jump Street franchise mashup, MIB 23, which Jonah Hill admitted last year was “too complicated” in terms of the deals needed. That film remains in development, however."
Read more at http://www.comingsoon.net/movies/news/891861-men-in-black-spin-off-gets-writers-release-date

_______________
Last Movie Watched: Texas Chainsaw Massacre: The Next Generation (1994).
Last TV Show Watched: Mighty Morphin Power Rangers (S3:E6).
Last Video Game Played: Madden '18 (XBO).
http://bloggerofthedead.blogspot.com/​
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Troyal1
Veteran
Veteran
avatar

Posts : 1117
Points : 1705
Reputation : 34
Join date : 2016-06-08
Age : 23

PostSubject: Re: General Movie Discussion   Fri Sep 29, 2017 11:36 pm

@BarrytheOnyx wrote:
@jericho wrote:
who gets in trouble for sidelining movie references, me, or you?

What's, the fastest approach to understanding culture, aside from, losing subtitles so babies just get used to a world without them, and learn to translate for us, like, their Mexican or Russian parents, you know?

I'm sorry, but how does this have anything to do with the previous post about The Nice Guys?

At any rate, I'm less than thrilled by this news and frankly see it as the film equivalent of trying to resuscitate someone by hitting them on the head with a wrench: wrongheaded and guaranteed to harm the property.

I'm not exactly sure what he's asking.

But yes I agree. The thing is though I understand trying to cash in on popular stuff like Ghostbusters. But this a film that came out last year, and its hardly a mainstream phenomenon. I just don't get why this would be profitable.
Back to top Go down
View user profile Online
Rhedosaurus
Veteran
Veteran
avatar

Posts : 3172
Points : 3824
Reputation : 36
Join date : 2016-06-08
Age : 29
Location : Armada, Michigan

PostSubject: Re: General Movie Discussion   Mon Oct 02, 2017 8:13 pm

The Flatliners reboot bombed and Lego Ninjago has underperformed.

Meanwhile, Kingsman: The Golden Circle is still first place at the box office with the It! remake at a very close 2nd.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Sickle_Claw
Moderator
Moderator
avatar

Posts : 957
Points : 3080
Reputation : 16
Join date : 2012-04-07

PostSubject: Re: General Movie Discussion   Mon Oct 02, 2017 8:19 pm

@Rhedosaurus wrote:
The Flatliners reboot bombed and Lego Ninjago has underperformed.

Meanwhile, Kingsman: The Golden Circle is still #1 at the box office with the It! remake at a very close 2nd.

I actually liked Kingsman, thought it was very entertaining, and worked well for being a popcorn movie.

_______________
Read my Story Jurassic Park: Chaos Theory!
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Rhedosaurus
Veteran
Veteran
avatar

Posts : 3172
Points : 3824
Reputation : 36
Join date : 2016-06-08
Age : 29
Location : Armada, Michigan

PostSubject: Re: General Movie Discussion   Mon Oct 02, 2017 8:26 pm

@Sickle_Claw wrote:
@Rhedosaurus wrote:
The Flatliners reboot bombed and Lego Ninjago has underperformed.

Meanwhile, Kingsman: The Golden Circle is still #1 at the box office with the It! remake at a very close 2nd.

I actually liked Kingsman, thought it was very entertaining, and worked well for being a popcorn movie.

Maybe it's just me, but I feel that this is a stronger start for fall/autumn movies then it has been in recent years.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Oshronosaurus
Ankylosaurus
Ankylosaurus
avatar

Posts : 404
Points : 983
Reputation : 15
Join date : 2016-06-10

PostSubject: Re: General Movie Discussion   Wed Oct 04, 2017 3:56 am

Flatliners was a remake?

it looked bad in any case. doesn't help that practically every ad i was getting on YouTube was a trailer for it.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Rhedosaurus
Veteran
Veteran
avatar

Posts : 3172
Points : 3824
Reputation : 36
Join date : 2016-06-08
Age : 29
Location : Armada, Michigan

PostSubject: Re: General Movie Discussion   Wed Oct 04, 2017 5:24 pm

@Oshronosaurus wrote:
Flatliners was a remake?

it looked bad in any case. doesn't help that practically every ad i was getting on YouTube was a trailer for it.

Yes. The original one came out in 1990.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Rhedosaurus
Veteran
Veteran
avatar

Posts : 3172
Points : 3824
Reputation : 36
Join date : 2016-06-08
Age : 29
Location : Armada, Michigan

PostSubject: Re: General Movie Discussion   Thu Oct 05, 2017 7:10 pm

Harvey Weinstein hit with a New York Times report that details 30 years of reports of sexual harassment of woman.

And yet, Hollywood lectures the common man about decency and morals.

I have to ask: Why now? Do women really hold enough power in Hollywood nowadays to take him down?
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Dead2009
Administrator
Administrator
avatar

Posts : 1263
Points : 1905
Reputation : 21
Join date : 2016-06-07
Location : Maryland

PostSubject: Re: General Movie Discussion   Fri Oct 06, 2017 7:39 pm

@Oshronosaurus wrote:
Flatliners was a remake?

it looked bad in any case. doesn't help that practically every ad i was getting on YouTube was a trailer for it.

No, it's classed as a sequel because Kiefer Sutherland's character in the original is in this one as well.

Jackie Chan Confirms Rush Hour 4 is Happening
http://www.comingsoon.net/movies/news/893601-jackie-chan-confirms-rush-hour-4-is-happening

_______________
Last Movie Watched: Texas Chainsaw Massacre: The Next Generation (1994).
Last TV Show Watched: Mighty Morphin Power Rangers (S3:E6).
Last Video Game Played: Madden '18 (XBO).
http://bloggerofthedead.blogspot.com/​
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Troyal1
Veteran
Veteran
avatar

Posts : 1117
Points : 1705
Reputation : 34
Join date : 2016-06-08
Age : 23

PostSubject: Re: General Movie Discussion   Fri Oct 06, 2017 9:42 pm

Saw Blade runner 2049. I am not a big fan of the original.

2049 is my favorite film of the year. I liked it that much. Wow is all I feel. IMAX is a must.
Back to top Go down
View user profile Online
Rhedosaurus
Veteran
Veteran
avatar

Posts : 3172
Points : 3824
Reputation : 36
Join date : 2016-06-08
Age : 29
Location : Armada, Michigan

PostSubject: Re: General Movie Discussion   Fri Oct 06, 2017 10:56 pm

Back to top Go down
View user profile
Troyal1
Veteran
Veteran
avatar

Posts : 1117
Points : 1705
Reputation : 34
Join date : 2016-06-08
Age : 23

PostSubject: Re: General Movie Discussion   Fri Oct 06, 2017 11:07 pm

@Dead2009 wrote:
@Oshronosaurus wrote:
Flatliners was a remake?

it looked bad in any case. doesn't help that practically every ad i was getting on YouTube was a trailer for it.

No, it's classed as a sequel because Kiefer Sutherland's character in the original is in this one as well.

Jackie Chan Confirms Rush Hour 4 is Happening
http://www.comingsoon.net/movies/news/893601-jackie-chan-confirms-rush-hour-4-is-happening

He plays a different character in this one. 99% sure it was a remake after all.
Back to top Go down
View user profile Online
Rhedosaurus
Veteran
Veteran
avatar

Posts : 3172
Points : 3824
Reputation : 36
Join date : 2016-06-08
Age : 29
Location : Armada, Michigan

PostSubject: Re: General Movie Discussion   Sat Oct 07, 2017 3:06 pm

Back to top Go down
View user profile
Sponsored content




PostSubject: Re: General Movie Discussion   

Back to top Go down
 
General Movie Discussion
View previous topic View next topic Back to top 
Page 18 of 20Go to page : Previous  1 ... 10 ... 17, 18, 19, 20  Next
 Similar topics
-
» General Glee Discussion Thread--Part 6
» General Glee Discussion Thread--Part 4
» SUMMER REWATCH: Syriana discussion
» General Glee Discussion Thread--Part 1
» General Glee Discussion Thread--Part 3

Permissions in this forum:You cannot reply to topics in this forum
Jurassic Mainframe Forums :: The Innovation Center :: Off-Topic Discussions-
Jump to: