Where Life Found a Way...est. 2016
 
HomeMainframeCalendarFAQSearchMemberlistUsergroupsRegisterLog in

Share | 
 

 General Jurassic World 2 News Thread

View previous topic View next topic Go down 
Go to page : Previous  1 ... 12 ... 20, 21, 22, 23  Next
AuthorMessage
Spinosaur4.4
Spinosaurus
Spinosaurus
avatar

Posts : 788
Join date : 2016-06-07
Location : My cubby room aka My world

PostSubject: Re: General Jurassic World 2 News Thread   Sat Mar 25, 2017 9:07 am

I would love Ellie Sattler to be back. People only remember Grant and Malcolm, I'm tired of seeing this everywhere. How can you forget the amazing character of Ellie? She's the most underrated character from the original trio.

So yep, I rather see her back than Grant or Malcolm. Enough with overrated characters. Fire me.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Guest
Guest



PostSubject: Re: General Jurassic World 2 News Thread   Sat Mar 25, 2017 9:10 am

I'd still rather have Malcolm and/or Grant, but if I could get Sattler back I'd be quite pleased nevertheless. Her characterization was fine in JP3 though I never want to see her kids (guess teenages by now) on screen again. Taylor Nichols though would be interesting in more than just cardboard cutout role lol, you know if he actually did something

Anyway it's not as if Goldblum has rejected the idea of returning either, but they just don't have good enough writers to get him in I guess
Back to top Go down
Rhedosaurus
Ultimasaurus
Ultimasaurus
avatar

Posts : 2192
Join date : 2016-06-08
Age : 29
Location : Armada, Michigan

PostSubject: Re: General Jurassic World 2 News Thread   Sat Mar 25, 2017 9:23 am

@Spinosaur4.4 wrote:
I would love Ellie Sattler to be back. People only remember Grant and Malcolm, I'm tired of seeing this everywhere. How can you forget the amazing character of Ellie? She's the most underrated character from the original trio.

I remember reading an issue of Total Film before JW came out that one of the scripts that was written before the one we got had her coming back. IIRC, the title of the script was 'The Return Of Dr. Sattler', though that wasn't going to be the name of the movie.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Tyrant Lizard
Stegosaurus
Stegosaurus
avatar

Posts : 391
Join date : 2016-06-07
Age : 27
Location : Vancouver, Canada

PostSubject: Re: General Jurassic World 2 News Thread   Sat Mar 25, 2017 9:44 am

Mistral wrote:
but they just don't have good enough writers to get him in I guess

Yeah, I'm sure that's it.

Back to top Go down
View user profile
Guest
Guest



PostSubject: Re: General Jurassic World 2 News Thread   Sat Mar 25, 2017 9:59 am

@Tyrant Lizard wrote:
Mistral wrote:
but they just don't have good enough writers to get him in I guess

Yeah, I'm sure that's it.


Ha ha

Ha ha

Spoiler:
 

But it is the excuse they have used in the past, as in they supposedly can't write them in.
Back to top Go down
Tyrant Lizard
Stegosaurus
Stegosaurus
avatar

Posts : 391
Join date : 2016-06-07
Age : 27
Location : Vancouver, Canada

PostSubject: Re: General Jurassic World 2 News Thread   Sat Mar 25, 2017 10:10 am

Mistral wrote:
@Tyrant Lizard wrote:
Mistral wrote:
but they just don't have good enough writers to get him in I guess

Yeah, I'm sure that's it.


Ha ha

Ha ha

Spoiler:
 

But it is the excuse they have used in the past, as in they supposedly can't write them in.

Perhaps it's simply because bringing old characters back isn't a significant priority to the writers

Perhaps it's because the writers would rather work on developing their own characters.

Point is that it really wouldn't be that hard to write old characters back in if they really wanted to, and I think the above two options are more likely than simply dismissing the writers as "not good enough".
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Spinosaur4.4
Spinosaurus
Spinosaurus
avatar

Posts : 788
Join date : 2016-06-07
Location : My cubby room aka My world

PostSubject: Re: General Jurassic World 2 News Thread   Sat Mar 25, 2017 10:54 am

@Tyrant Lizard wrote:
Mistral wrote:
@Tyrant Lizard wrote:
Mistral wrote:
but they just don't have good enough writers to get him in I guess

Yeah, I'm sure that's it.


Ha ha

Ha ha

Spoiler:
 

But it is the excuse they have used in the past, as in they supposedly can't write them in.

Perhaps it's simply because bringing old characters back isn't a significant priority to the writers

Perhaps it's because the writers would rather work on developing their own characters.

Point is that it really wouldn't be that hard to write old characters back in if they really wanted to, and I think the above two options are more likely than simply dismissing the writers as "not good enough".
This. We don't need useless cameos. People need to get over nostalgia and accept things change. We can't have all JP movies centered around Malcolm just because everyone likes him.

I'm glad we'll have new characters, I can now have another favorites and like more characters. Very Happy
Back to top Go down
View user profile
owenpratt
Ankylosaurus
Ankylosaurus
avatar

Posts : 241
Join date : 2016-06-08
Age : 22
Location : Italy

PostSubject: Re: General Jurassic World 2 News Thread   Sat Mar 25, 2017 11:35 am

I don't want old JP characters returning neither. This is a new trilogy for a new generation IMO. Let's enjoy the new characters and their stories.
If we want to see Malcolm etc, let's watch JP and TLW again.
Also, I rather having screenwriters who admit (if Mistral's theory turned out to be true) not to be able to write old characters in the new script and consequentially avoid it, than screenwriters who put them thinking they know how to do that and delivering some of the worst sequels ever made (I'm looking at you, "Independence Day: Resurgence").
The only classic character returning was Wu, and I really don't think they put him in for nostalgia sake (90% of non-fans don't even remember him from the 1st movie).
Back to top Go down
View user profile
dance2nite
Ankylosaurus
Ankylosaurus
avatar

Posts : 271
Join date : 2016-06-08
Age : 24
Location : Melbourne, Australia

PostSubject: Re: General Jurassic World 2 News Thread   Sat Mar 25, 2017 5:01 pm

@owenpratt wrote:
I don't want old JP characters returning neither. This is a new trilogy for a new generation IMO. Let's enjoy the new characters and their stories.
If we want to see Malcolm etc, let's watch JP and TLW again.
Also, I rather having screenwriters who admit (if Mistral's theory turned out to be true) not to be able to write old characters in the new script and consequentially avoid it, than screenwriters who put them thinking they know how to do that and delivering some of the worst sequels ever made (I'm looking at you, "Independence Day: Resurgence").
The only classic character returning was Wu, and I really don't think they put him in for nostalgia sake (90% of non-fans don't even remember him from the 1st movie).

+1! I can agree
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Troyal1
Spinosaurus
Spinosaurus
avatar

Posts : 666
Join date : 2016-06-08
Age : 23

PostSubject: Re: General Jurassic World 2 News Thread   Sat Mar 25, 2017 7:40 pm

@Tyrant Lizard wrote:
Mistral wrote:
@Tyrant Lizard wrote:
Mistral wrote:
but they just don't have good enough writers to get him in I guess

Yeah, I'm sure that's it.


Ha ha

Ha ha

Spoiler:
 

But it is the excuse they have used in the past, as in they supposedly can't write them in.

Perhaps it's simply because bringing old characters back isn't a significant priority to the writers

Perhaps it's because the writers would rather work on developing their own characters.

Point is that it really wouldn't be that hard to write old characters back in if they really wanted to, and I think the above two options are more likely than simply dismissing the writers as "not good enough".

Sadly I do have to agree.

I mean I personally do want to see the old characters back. But I know if I was a writer helming the new JP films that those characters would be so "sacred" that I wouldn't want to write them in, for fear of ruining their characters and making it forced feeling. 

I completely understand the writers wanting to focus on mainly new characters when I put myself in their shoes. I also think people are underestimating how good these new characters could potentially be. 

We have to remember that we have only seen one movie in the "new trilogy" so to speak. The characters we know are probably going to get developed a lot more. Personally I think they did a pretty excellent job at making Claire a character that I'm somewhat invested in, and that's just from JW alone. 

And please Tom Hardy lol
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Rhedosaurus
Ultimasaurus
Ultimasaurus
avatar

Posts : 2192
Join date : 2016-06-08
Age : 29
Location : Armada, Michigan

PostSubject: Re: General Jurassic World 2 News Thread   Sat Mar 25, 2017 7:48 pm

@Troyal1 wrote:
@Tyrant Lizard wrote:
Mistral wrote:
@Tyrant Lizard wrote:
Mistral wrote:
but they just don't have good enough writers to get him in I guess

Yeah, I'm sure that's it.


Ha ha

Ha ha

Spoiler:
 

But it is the excuse they have used in the past, as in they supposedly can't write them in.

Perhaps it's simply because bringing old characters back isn't a significant priority to the writers

Perhaps it's because the writers would rather work on developing their own characters.

Point is that it really wouldn't be that hard to write old characters back in if they really wanted to, and I think the above two options are more likely than simply dismissing the writers as "not good enough".

Sadly I do have to agree.

I mean I personally do want to see the old characters back. But I know if I was a writer helming the new JP films that those characters would be so "sacred" that I wouldn't want to write them in, for fear of ruining their characters and making it forced feeling. 

I completely understand the writers wanting to focus on mainly new characters when I put myself in their shoes. I also think people are underestimating how good these new characters could potentially be. 

We have to remember that we have only seen one movie in the "new trilogy" so to speak. The characters we know are probably going to get developed a lot more. Personally I think they did a pretty excellent job at making Claire a character that I'm somewhat invested in, and that's just from JW alone. 

And please Tom Hardy lol

But surely they can bring back one of the original writers to help them out. There has to be at least one of them still alive.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Spinosaur4.4
Spinosaurus
Spinosaurus
avatar

Posts : 788
Join date : 2016-06-07
Location : My cubby room aka My world

PostSubject: Re: General Jurassic World 2 News Thread   Sat Mar 25, 2017 7:49 pm

@owenpratt wrote:
I don't want old JP characters returning neither. This is a new trilogy for a new generation IMO. Let's enjoy the new characters and their stories.
If we want to see Malcolm etc, let's watch JP and TLW again.
Also, I rather having screenwriters who admit (if Mistral's theory turned out to be true) not to be able to write old characters in the new script and consequentially avoid it, than screenwriters who put them thinking they know how to do that and delivering some of the worst sequels ever made (I'm looking at you, "Independence Day: Resurgence").
The only classic character returning was Wu, and I really don't think they put him in for nostalgia sake (90% of non-fans don't even remember him from the 1st movie).
I agree. Also, that's why Wu's return is awesome, he doesn't need to be loved or remembered to be important and awesome.  Cool
Back to top Go down
View user profile
owenpratt
Ankylosaurus
Ankylosaurus
avatar

Posts : 241
Join date : 2016-06-08
Age : 22
Location : Italy

PostSubject: Re: General Jurassic World 2 News Thread   Mon Mar 27, 2017 8:10 am

Spoiler:
 
Back to top Go down
View user profile
V.a.nublarensis
Dilophosaurus
Dilophosaurus
avatar

Posts : 106
Join date : 2016-06-07
Age : 15

PostSubject: Re: General Jurassic World 2 News Thread   Mon Mar 27, 2017 8:15 am

That's a Sorna-like environment, I'd say.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
owenpratt
Ankylosaurus
Ankylosaurus
avatar

Posts : 241
Join date : 2016-06-08
Age : 22
Location : Italy

PostSubject: Re: General Jurassic World 2 News Thread   Mon Mar 27, 2017 8:20 am

@V.a.nublarensis wrote:
That's a Sorna-like environment, I'd say.

I don't know, but this Jurassic World sequel keeps surprising me. And we still don't even know the plot ahah
Back to top Go down
View user profile
The Geeky Zoologist
Hatchling
Hatchling
avatar

Posts : 34
Join date : 2016-06-10
Age : 21

PostSubject: Re: General Jurassic World 2 News Thread   Mon Mar 27, 2017 10:14 am

I think it's the manor's portal.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Angelo2036
Unhatched Egg
Unhatched Egg


Posts : 2
Join date : 2016-10-14

PostSubject: Re: General Jurassic World 2 News Thread   Mon Mar 27, 2017 7:54 pm

If part of the plot takes place in a British manor and part of it on an overgrown Isla Nublar, and it involves new companies having access to dino DNA for their own (perhaps nefarious) purposes, maybe it will bear some significant similarities to the JP4 Sayles script.

Replace the British manor with a castle in the Swiss Alps, consider the return to Nublar to "rescue" the dinosaurs (Nedry's can anyone?), and the plot involving new companies and new uses for the dinosaurs and the dinosaur cloning technology, and it sounds pretty similar to the Sayles script.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Tyrant Lizard
Stegosaurus
Stegosaurus
avatar

Posts : 391
Join date : 2016-06-07
Age : 27
Location : Vancouver, Canada

PostSubject: Re: General Jurassic World 2 News Thread   Tue Mar 28, 2017 12:27 pm

Oh God. Please don't say that!
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Troyal1
Spinosaurus
Spinosaurus
avatar

Posts : 666
Join date : 2016-06-08
Age : 23

PostSubject: Re: General Jurassic World 2 News Thread   Sat Apr 01, 2017 9:25 pm

God damn this was cruel lol. 

https://instagram.com/p/BSWHKVujEra/
Back to top Go down
View user profile
BarrytheOnyx
Spinosaurus
Spinosaurus
avatar

Posts : 736
Join date : 2016-06-17
Age : 24
Location : Stratford Upon Avon, England

PostSubject: Re: General Jurassic World 2 News Thread   Sun Apr 02, 2017 4:19 am

Well, I guess that officially closes any chance of Sam being in JW2.

Part of me IS hoping that this some kind of clever disguise to throw fans off course by making us think he's not involved when he actually is. But in reality I know what this means.
Back to top Go down
View user profile Online
Troyal1
Spinosaurus
Spinosaurus
avatar

Posts : 666
Join date : 2016-06-08
Age : 23

PostSubject: Re: General Jurassic World 2 News Thread   Sun Apr 02, 2017 10:00 am

@BarrytheOnyx wrote:
Well, I guess that officially closes any chance of Sam being in JW2.

Part of me IS hoping that this some kind of clever disguise to throw fans off course by making us think he's not involved when he actually is. But in reality I know what this means.

Did he actually tweet that? I was under the impression that they edited it and posted it on Instagram to fool people, but I could be wrong. Because when I headed over to his Twitter page he had already deleted it. I'll check around and see
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Rhedosaurus
Ultimasaurus
Ultimasaurus
avatar

Posts : 2192
Join date : 2016-06-08
Age : 29
Location : Armada, Michigan

PostSubject: Re: General Jurassic World 2 News Thread   Sun Apr 02, 2017 10:09 am

For a few years, I've believed that he'd never come back because of how JP3 broke him and that the wait for JW to get made finished off any hope of that. It's no secret that he was quite disgruntled during the filming of JP3. The way I see it, if he is not interested in being Dr. Grant anymore, then kill him off, and bring back Malcolm and Ellie as well as Lex and Time who get their grandfather's dinosaurs and islands back at the very end of the movie franchise.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
V.a.nublarensis
Dilophosaurus
Dilophosaurus
avatar

Posts : 106
Join date : 2016-06-07
Age : 15

PostSubject: Re: General Jurassic World 2 News Thread   Sun Apr 02, 2017 10:39 am

Killing him would be going too far. Returning characters aren't necessary and if they're simply not a part of the story, just make a reference to them or not mention them at all.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Rhedosaurus
Ultimasaurus
Ultimasaurus
avatar

Posts : 2192
Join date : 2016-06-08
Age : 29
Location : Armada, Michigan

PostSubject: Re: General Jurassic World 2 News Thread   Sun Apr 02, 2017 10:57 am

@V.a.nublarensis wrote:
Killing him would be going too far. Returning characters aren't necessary and if they're simply not a part of the story, just make a reference to them or not mention them at all.

I'm not saying to kill him on screen, but have somebody mention that he died of cancer or something like that.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Troyal1
Spinosaurus
Spinosaurus
avatar

Posts : 666
Join date : 2016-06-08
Age : 23

PostSubject: Re: General Jurassic World 2 News Thread   Sun Apr 02, 2017 10:58 am

Still trying to figure out if Sam himself was the one to tweet out the joke or if someone edited it.

No answer yet.

Although I doubt it matters either way to be completely honest(as far as him appearing).

I just wanted to know if it was him specifically, cause I'm nosy like that Very Happy
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Guest
Guest



PostSubject: Re: General Jurassic World 2 News Thread   Sun Apr 02, 2017 11:30 am

I see some might have misinterpreted some of my saying earlier here, but I'm too lazy to start going through them now so screw it.

@Rhedosaurus wrote:
It's no secret that he was quite disgruntled during the filming of JP3.

No proof whatsoever of that, only baseless rumors.

In any case, killing him off offscreen would be just as convoluted and meaningless as Henry Jones Senior in Kingdom of the Crystal Skull, or Chief Brody in Jaws the Revenge.
Back to top Go down
Rhedosaurus
Ultimasaurus
Ultimasaurus
avatar

Posts : 2192
Join date : 2016-06-08
Age : 29
Location : Armada, Michigan

PostSubject: Re: General Jurassic World 2 News Thread   Sun Apr 02, 2017 11:41 am

Mistral wrote:
I see some might have misinterpreted some of my saying earlier here, but I'm too lazy to start going through them now so screw it.

@Rhedosaurus wrote:
It's no secret that he was quite disgruntled during the filming of JP3.

No proof whatsoever of that, only baseless rumors.

In any case, killing him off offscreen would be just as convoluted and meaningless as Henry Jones Senior in Kingdom of the Crystal Skull, or Chief Brody in Jaws the Revenge.

Rumors don't come from nowhere and in many cases turn out to be true. Troubled movie productions more often then not=disgruntled/unhappy actors. Fant4stic anybody?
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Guest
Guest



PostSubject: Re: General Jurassic World 2 News Thread   Sun Apr 02, 2017 4:15 pm

@Rhedosaurus wrote:
Mistral wrote:
I see some might have misinterpreted some of my saying earlier here, but I'm too lazy to start going through them now so screw it.

@Rhedosaurus wrote:
It's no secret that he was quite disgruntled during the filming of JP3.

No proof whatsoever of that, only baseless rumors.

In any case, killing him off offscreen would be just as convoluted and meaningless as Henry Jones Senior in Kingdom of the Crystal Skull, or Chief Brody in Jaws the Revenge.

Rumors don't come from nowhere and in many cases turn out to be true. Troubled movie productions more often then not=disgruntled/unhappy actors. Fant4stic anybody?

Rumors can come out of nowhere and suddenly start an avalanche that just keeps rolling to no end without any factual basis. If we look at near history, many laughable medieval myths today exist not only because of the 19th century romantic movement but more importantly because in 18th century enlightenment period people made either poorly judged or otherwise subjective faulty remarks of history that had nothing to do with facts. For example the Roman inquisition was essentially turned into torture porn and witch hunts, and Columbus simply finding route to Asia into proving that Earth was round. Similarly troubled productions in films can make people imaging all sorts of background dramas that never happened (yes JP3 had well documented script issues but that doesn't automatically mean everyone incl actors were miserable). It only requires one person somewhere saying it and it spreads. Fake assumption, no matter if subjective or objective made. People then can keep pointing out to the "evidence" somewhere, from alleged "sources".
Back to top Go down
Rhedosaurus
Ultimasaurus
Ultimasaurus
avatar

Posts : 2192
Join date : 2016-06-08
Age : 29
Location : Armada, Michigan

PostSubject: Re: General Jurassic World 2 News Thread   Sun Apr 02, 2017 4:55 pm

Mistral wrote:
@Rhedosaurus wrote:
Mistral wrote:
I see some might have misinterpreted some of my saying earlier here, but I'm too lazy to start going through them now so screw it.

@Rhedosaurus wrote:
It's no secret that he was quite disgruntled during the filming of JP3.

No proof whatsoever of that, only baseless rumors.

In any case, killing him off offscreen would be just as convoluted and meaningless as Henry Jones Senior in Kingdom of the Crystal Skull, or Chief Brody in Jaws the Revenge.

Rumors don't come from nowhere and in many cases turn out to be true. Troubled movie productions more often then not=disgruntled/unhappy actors. Fant4stic anybody?

Rumors can come out of nowhere and suddenly start an avalanche that just keeps rolling to no end without any factual basis. If we look at near history, many laughable medieval myths today exist not only because of the 19th century romantic movement but more importantly because in 18th century enlightenment period people made either poorly judged or otherwise subjective faulty remarks of history that had nothing to do with facts. For example the Roman inquisition was essentially turned into torture porn and witch hunts, and Columbus simply finding route to Asia into proving that Earth was round. Similarly troubled productions in films can make people imaging all sorts of background dramas that never happened (yes JP3 had well documented script issues but that doesn't automatically mean everyone incl actors were miserable). It only requires one person somewhere saying it and it spreads. Fake assumption, no matter if subjective or objective made. People then can keep pointing out to the "evidence" somewhere, from alleged "sources".

Here's the thing. They didn't have the internet back then. With Riddit and 4Chan, a disgruntled worker for a movie studio can spill out a lot of details about a movie and get away with it. And the power to leak stuff behind the web of anonymity on the internet without getting caught is very strong. Besides, look at all the movie leaks that turned out to right in the past. Surly, you've heard of how somebody namedStantz1984, who said he was a post production worker at Sony leaked the entire script of GB2016, right? And given how movie leaks on Reddit and 4Chan have been right before, I don't see how you can causally throw out the rumor of Neill being disgruntled. I remember on Dan's JP3 page how he was unhappy with how everything turned out. Besides, you don't think that some people wouldn't be unhappy with the script problems and the end result via them writing it on the fly?
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Guest
Guest



PostSubject: Re: General Jurassic World 2 News Thread   Sun Apr 02, 2017 5:22 pm

@Rhedosaurus wrote:
Mistral wrote:
@Rhedosaurus wrote:
Mistral wrote:
I see some might have misinterpreted some of my saying earlier here, but I'm too lazy to start going through them now so screw it.

@Rhedosaurus wrote:
It's no secret that he was quite disgruntled during the filming of JP3.

No proof whatsoever of that, only baseless rumors.

In any case, killing him off offscreen would be just as convoluted and meaningless as Henry Jones Senior in Kingdom of the Crystal Skull, or Chief Brody in Jaws the Revenge.

Rumors don't come from nowhere and in many cases turn out to be true. Troubled movie productions more often then not=disgruntled/unhappy actors. Fant4stic anybody?

Rumors can come out of nowhere and suddenly start an avalanche that just keeps rolling to no end without any factual basis. If we look at near history, many laughable medieval myths today exist not only because of the 19th century romantic movement but more importantly because in 18th century enlightenment period people made either poorly judged or otherwise subjective faulty remarks of history that had nothing to do with facts. For example the Roman inquisition was essentially turned into torture porn and witch hunts, and Columbus simply finding route to Asia into proving that Earth was round. Similarly troubled productions in films can make people imaging all sorts of background dramas that never happened (yes JP3 had well documented script issues but that doesn't automatically mean everyone incl actors were miserable). It only requires one person somewhere saying it and it spreads. Fake assumption, no matter if subjective or objective made. People then can keep pointing out to the "evidence" somewhere, from alleged "sources".

Here's the thing. They didn't have the internet back then. With Riddit and 4Chan, a disgruntled worker for a movie studio can spill out a lot of details about a movie and get away with it. And the power to leak stuff behind the web of anonymity on the internet without getting caught is very strong. Besides, look at all the movie leaks that turned out to right in the past. Surly, you've heard of how somebody namedStantz1984, who said he was a post production worker at Sony leaked the entire script of GB2016, right? And given how movie leaks on Reddit and 4Chan have been right before, I don't see how you can causally throw out the rumor of Neill being disgruntled. I remember on Dan's JP3 page how he was unhappy with how everything turned out. Besides, you don't think that some people wouldn't be unhappy with the script problems and the end result via them writing it on the fly?

Even people who have said pyramids were built by ancient astronauts have "proof" somewhere they can show without blink of an eye. It's "proof" they have carefully hand picked from pieces out of context, and everything else is ignored under the excuse of conspiracy all right, but there you go.

Now, I don't care of Ghostbusters or Sony so no, I didn't know of that what you say, but even though in that particular case the details were correct, I don't think single examples prove anything in grand scheme of things. Hell, even if 90% of these film cases turned out to be true, it still doesn't mean you should trust everything you read blindly. In other words, just because things out to be true in one case doesn't mean jack for another case. Movie A circumstances don't automatically correlate into Movie B. People can make all sorts of BS statements for whatever reasons.

I'm not saying Neill being destroyed by JP3 couldn't be true, or that people couldn't be unhappy at the time of production/script issues, I mean of course it's within the realms of possibility. There's nothing saying it didn't happen. But then again, there's no actual proof it did. Only baseless rumors. Sure it might have happened, but it might just be complete myth BS. And while I do realize that one shouldn't automatically claim something as BS because there's no proof of it, it's even more foolish to claim it happened when there's no evidence whatsoever. You claim "there's no secret", but that is guess based on guess. Which may be start of a myth similar what I was talking in my historical reference.

Finally, if you really want to stick to the age of Internet aspect... JP3 is a film that entered filming in summer of 2000, long before modern social media really took off, so even if we ignore everything else and pretend everything written on internet was true, the times were different even then.
Back to top Go down
dance2nite
Ankylosaurus
Ankylosaurus
avatar

Posts : 271
Join date : 2016-06-08
Age : 24
Location : Melbourne, Australia

PostSubject: Re: General Jurassic World 2 News Thread   Sun Apr 02, 2017 5:36 pm

Jack Horner did a Q&A at the Jurassic Outpost fan exhibition day in Philadelphia today & mentioned that the script for JW2 is "exciting" & kept mentioning Carnotaurus throughout the Q&A, could that be a hint we may see one in the new film? Hope so... Cool
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Guest
Guest



PostSubject: Re: General Jurassic World 2 News Thread   Sun Apr 02, 2017 5:41 pm

@Troyal1 wrote:
Still trying to figure out if Sam himself was the one to tweet out the joke or if someone edited it.

No answer yet.

Although I doubt it matters either way to be completely honest(as far as him appearing).

I just wanted to know if it was him specifically, cause I'm nosy like that Very Happy

Somehow I doubt Sam would have used hashtag #JW2...
Back to top Go down
Rhedosaurus
Ultimasaurus
Ultimasaurus
avatar

Posts : 2192
Join date : 2016-06-08
Age : 29
Location : Armada, Michigan

PostSubject: Re: General Jurassic World 2 News Thread   Sun Apr 02, 2017 5:45 pm

@dance2nite wrote:
Jack Horner did a Q&A at the Jurassic Outpost fan exhibition day in Philadelphia today & mentioned that the script for JW2 is "exciting" & kept mentioning Carnotaurus throughout the Q&A, could that be a hint we may see one in the new film? Hope so... Cool

I would like to see Carnotaurus. I would like to see Horner get fired and replaced by somebody else (Scott Hartman)even better.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
V.a.nublarensis
Dilophosaurus
Dilophosaurus
avatar

Posts : 106
Join date : 2016-06-07
Age : 15

PostSubject: Re: General Jurassic World 2 News Thread   Mon Apr 03, 2017 6:50 am

@Rhedosaurus wrote:
@V.a.nublarensis wrote:
Killing him would be going too far. Returning characters aren't necessary and if they're simply not a part of the story, just make a reference to them or not mention them at all.

I'm not saying to kill him on screen, but have somebody mention that he died of cancer or something like that.
That'd be one of the most pointless fan disservice ever.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
BarrytheOnyx
Spinosaurus
Spinosaurus
avatar

Posts : 736
Join date : 2016-06-17
Age : 24
Location : Stratford Upon Avon, England

PostSubject: Re: General Jurassic World 2 News Thread   Mon Apr 03, 2017 7:41 am

@V.a.nublarensis wrote:
@Rhedosaurus wrote:
@V.a.nublarensis wrote:
Killing him would be going too far. Returning characters aren't necessary and if they're simply not a part of the story, just make a reference to them or not mention them at all.

I'm not saying to kill him on screen, but have somebody mention that he died of cancer or something like that.
That'd be one of the most pointless fan disservice ever.

Yeah, I echo that sentiment, if you must kill of a character who hasn't passed on in real life due to age like Richard Attenborough, make it matter. If Malcolm or Grant were to appear in some capacity and having one or the other dying helped service the story in some way and would be emotionally impactful on audiences, then it could work. Mentioning them as having died off-screen, even with a real life impetus to reinforce that, would come off as bad taste. Hammond's death was kept ambiguous for several years after The Lost World, and in the case of Jurassic Park III there was no evidence presented as to whether he was alive or not, and during the revolving door of possible sequel ideas the option of bringing Attenborough back was kept open, until it looked like his age and declining health would not allow for it.
Back to top Go down
View user profile Online
Spinosaur4.4
Spinosaurus
Spinosaurus
avatar

Posts : 788
Join date : 2016-06-07
Location : My cubby room aka My world

PostSubject: Re: General Jurassic World 2 News Thread   Mon Apr 03, 2017 4:24 pm

So Rexy confirmed in JW2. What a surprise...

I hope she isn't the only T.rex that appears. We need a main one like Buck. If not, I'll pass.

And I still hope to see obscure dinosaurs, specially new theropods. I'm waiting. I'm dreaming.


And you guys only say that bc Grant is a fan favorite, if he was another paleo character no one would care if he died offscreen. Personally I wouldn't care if he died offscreen, I'm really tired of some fanservices so I would actually love a dark tone, show that everyone dies even fan favorites.

There are just 2 characters that I think I would not want to see dying offscreen, the rest I don't think I would care.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
BarrytheOnyx
Spinosaurus
Spinosaurus
avatar

Posts : 736
Join date : 2016-06-17
Age : 24
Location : Stratford Upon Avon, England

PostSubject: Re: General Jurassic World 2 News Thread   Mon Apr 03, 2017 4:38 pm

For those who would like to see proof of that; Colin Trevorrow confirming Rexy's appearance in the sequel via Twitter

As for me, I kinda had a feeling this would happen; after making such a strong comeback at the end of the last movie, it almost seemed inevitable.

With that said, I would have pushed for the introduction of a younger T. rex, male or female, as the new representative of the species, since the idea of T. rex as the larger than life, almost Godzilla like force of nature that inadvertently saves the day is probably played out for all it's worth. And I would love to see new large theropods be given some onscreen time to shine.

Ultimatley, we don't know how much she will appear in the film, even a well executed two to three minute cameo would suffice. If her appearance involves her still being an active hunter who attacks the Isla Nublar expedition on sight like a real predator, then I imagine we would regard her inclusion as a positive move overall. I've flip-flopped between this alternative option for months, and as of now I don't know how I would feel about Rexy appearing just to be killed off by old age, or worse bullet fire.
Back to top Go down
View user profile Online
dance2nite
Ankylosaurus
Ankylosaurus
avatar

Posts : 271
Join date : 2016-06-08
Age : 24
Location : Melbourne, Australia

PostSubject: Re: General Jurassic World 2 News Thread   Mon Apr 03, 2017 6:04 pm

I am happy with Rexy's return, I just hope she has a human kill again this time around like in JP.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Troyal1
Spinosaurus
Spinosaurus
avatar

Posts : 666
Join date : 2016-06-08
Age : 23

PostSubject: Re: General Jurassic World 2 News Thread   Mon Apr 03, 2017 8:34 pm

Oh MY GOD!!!!!! Yes!!!! 

Sorry but this pleases me. 

I wonder if the scene will be brief? I would like to see her eat someone as well but it would also kind of be cool to see her just as a peaceful animal not on the hunt in a scene IMO.

Edit: I know the tweet asking specifically refers to Rexy, but is there a chance Colin is talking only Species?
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Rhedosaurus
Ultimasaurus
Ultimasaurus
avatar

Posts : 2192
Join date : 2016-06-08
Age : 29
Location : Armada, Michigan

PostSubject: Re: General Jurassic World 2 News Thread   Mon Apr 03, 2017 9:01 pm

@BarrytheOnyx wrote:
For those who would like to see proof of that; Colin Trevorrow confirming Rexy's appearance in the sequel via Twitter

As for me, I kinda had a feeling this would happen; after making such a strong comeback at the end of the last movie, it almost seemed inevitable.

With that said, I would have pushed for the introduction of a younger T. rex, male or female, as the new representative of the species, since the idea of T. rex as the larger than life, almost Godzilla like force of nature that inadvertently saves the day is probably played out for all it's worth. And I would love to see new large theropods be given some onscreen time to shine.

Ultimatley, we don't know how much she will appear in the film, even a well executed two to three minute cameo would suffice. If her appearance involves her still being an active hunter who attacks the Isla Nublar expedition on sight like a real predator, then I imagine we would regard her inclusion as a positive move overall. I've flip-flopped between this alternative option for months, and as of now I don't know how I would feel about Rexy appearing just to be killed off by old age, or worse bullet fire.

Hopefully, she manages to have a biological heir. I heard something about a younger male T. rex. Maybe that can be her son or a younger mate. If that happens, then I wouldn't mind her dying from old age as long as it wasn't from man-made weapons.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Trexbreakout
Hatchling
Hatchling


Posts : 31
Join date : 2016-06-09

PostSubject: Re: General Jurassic World 2 News Thread   Mon Apr 03, 2017 11:42 pm

Is he talking about the old one on nublar or trex in general?
Back to top Go down
View user profile
V.a.nublarensis
Dilophosaurus
Dilophosaurus
avatar

Posts : 106
Join date : 2016-06-07
Age : 15

PostSubject: Re: General Jurassic World 2 News Thread   Tue Apr 04, 2017 5:03 am

I'm fine with it, but it's not particularly exciting news. As long as she doesn't get killed by guns, everything should be fine.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
doyouthinkhesaurus
Unhatched Egg
Unhatched Egg


Posts : 2
Join date : 2017-03-06

PostSubject: Re: General Jurassic World 2 News Thread   Tue Apr 04, 2017 9:19 am

@V.a.nublarensis wrote:
I'm fine with it, but it's not particularly exciting news. As long as she doesn't get killed by guns, everything should be fine.

I'm with you. Guns would be a horrible way to end it.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Guest
Guest



PostSubject: Re: General Jurassic World 2 News Thread   Tue Apr 04, 2017 12:24 pm

@Rhedosaurus wrote:
@BarrytheOnyx wrote:
For those who would like to see proof of that; Colin Trevorrow confirming Rexy's appearance in the sequel via Twitter

As for me, I kinda had a feeling this would happen; after making such a strong comeback at the end of the last movie, it almost seemed inevitable.

With that said, I would have pushed for the introduction of a younger T. rex, male or female, as the new representative of the species, since the idea of T. rex as the larger than life, almost Godzilla like force of nature that inadvertently saves the day is probably played out for all it's worth. And I would love to see new large theropods be given some onscreen time to shine.

Ultimatley, we don't know how much she will appear in the film, even a well executed two to three minute cameo would suffice. If her appearance involves her still being an active hunter who attacks the Isla Nublar expedition on sight like a real predator, then I imagine we would regard her inclusion as a positive move overall. I've flip-flopped between this alternative option for months, and as of now I don't know how I would feel about Rexy appearing just to be killed off by old age, or worse bullet fire.

Hopefully, she manages to have a biological heir. I heard something about a younger male T. rex. Maybe that can be her son or a younger mate. If that happens, then I wouldn't mind her dying from old age as long as it wasn't from man-made weapons.

Didn't we already have a film about T-Rex parenting and offsprings. No more of that, thanks.

Anyway the only thing more unsurprising than T-Rex being there again was the very unfortunate Nublar/island confirmation. But unlike with Nublar, I am actually fine of T-Rex being there, because like actors it can be written into new situations.

HOWEVER these two conditions will have to be met in order to satisfy me:
1) The thing shouldn't look as terrible and plastic as it did in JW
2) It's only brief cameo, and natural in that, as in not used as cheap fanservice device like in JW, or the weird controversial debacle in JP3.

Have people stumbling upon it when it's fighting Triceratops or whatever in the forest, followed by people quickly backing off with the sounds of the fight echoing the background, and the result of the fight is left unknown. It only needs to be a 1-2 minute scene and that's it. You know apart from the initial attack sequence, all the T-Rex scenes in the original film were as short as that. We really don't need more than that.

Then in JP6, if not in JP5, let's have quick look at it doing what it does in the nature before it and all the other dinosaurs are bombed to oblivion by humans. The last majestic cry of freedom. Utilize the animatronic upper body for one last time.

Of course that last paragraph will never happen thanks to market research and crap, but one can dream.
Back to top Go down
Troyal1
Spinosaurus
Spinosaurus
avatar

Posts : 666
Join date : 2016-06-08
Age : 23

PostSubject: Re: General Jurassic World 2 News Thread   Tue Apr 04, 2017 3:24 pm

I really hope it's animatronic. I'm probably dreaming but I thought it looked atrocious compared to Indy CGI wise.
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Sponsored content




PostSubject: Re: General Jurassic World 2 News Thread   

Back to top Go down
 
General Jurassic World 2 News Thread
View previous topic View next topic Back to top 
Page 21 of 23Go to page : Previous  1 ... 12 ... 20, 21, 22, 23  Next
 Similar topics
-
» The Official 'Man Of Steel' Non-News Thread
» The General Tolkien News Thread
» 'Iron Man 3' News Thread
» Quick/Debris[Junk-Doppel]Dandy-Draw
» Koa'ki Meiru Guardian Ruling Against Jinzo

Permissions in this forum:You cannot reply to topics in this forum
Jurassic Mainframe Boards :: The Franchise :: Film Universe :: Jurassic World Sequel News-
Jump to: